A lawsuit has been filed against the US government, accusing it of seizing over $100 million in cash, gold, and jewelry from citizens in California without providing any explanation.
The nonprofit Institute for Justice has taken legal action to stop the forfeiture proceedings for a group of individuals whose assets were confiscated by the FBI, with little clarity on the reasons behind it. The case revolves around a couple based in Los Angeles, Linda and Reggie Martin, who had $40,200 of their life savings seized from a safety deposit box without any evidence of illegal activity being presented by the agency.
Their attorney, Bob Belden, argues that the actions taken by the government are immoral, violating basic human rights as American citizens. The government employs civil forfeiture, allowing it to decide independently whether to seize and attempt to retain properties, even when there are no suspicions of criminal behavior.
The FBI sends standardized forfeiture notices that fail to provide owners with any information regarding the grounds for taking their assets, which the Institute for Justice deems unconstitutional. The operation conducted by the FBI at the Beverly Hills location resulted in the seizure of more than $100 million in various valuable assets.
Although the government issued blanket notices that vaguely referenced numerous federal crimes, it has refused to specify the exact wrongdoing in the case of the Martins. The lawsuit seeks to halt administrative proceedings for all recipients of the forfeiture notices. Linda states that neither she nor her husband have been charged with a crime and there is no indication of whether they will recover their money.
The Institute for Justice highlights that civil and criminal forfeiture is a lucrative practice for federal law enforcement, with individuals receiving inadequate notices that vaguely link their property to potential federal crimes. This particular situation demonstrates how federal forfeiture incentivizes agents to seize assets without sufficient cause, while keeping property owners in the dark to discourage resistance.
A federal judge has previously ruled that a client involved in the same safety deposit seizure operation received a deficient forfeiture notice, resulting in the FBI violating due process and the Fifth Amendment.
US Government Being Sued For Allegedly Stealing $100,000,000
Subscribe to the CryptoWeekly Newsletter
Get the top stories, funding deals, technical analysis, cryptocurrency jobs and much more delivered to your inbox, every Monday morning.
January 14,2025
Sygnum Bank Reaches Unicorn Status After Raising $58M
January 14,2025
Nate Geraci Predicts ETF Boom As 50 Launches Scheduled For 2025
January 14,2025
Biden Proposes Controversial Export Restriction On AI Chips
January 14,2025
Cardano And Ripple Confirm Partnership Over RLUSD Integration
January 13,2025
Saylor Pushes Aggressive Bitcoin Strategy Despite Volatility Concerns
January 13,2025
United Kingdom Enters Global AI Race With New Action Plan
January 13,2025
Everything You Need To Know About AI Agents
January 13,2025
SHIB Forms Head And Shoulders Pattern As Investors Begin To Worry
January 13,2025
Web3 Fundraising Deals - 7th To 13th January 2025
January 12,2025
Bitcoin Hovers Around $94K As Altcoins Continue To Struggle
January 12,2025
Dogecoin Fails To Break Through 4 Hour SMA Resistance
January 11,2025