The Ethereum (ETH) team aims to address the intricacies and scalability challenges of its current signature method, to which end Vitalik Buterin has delineated three alternative strategies aimed at improving the overall efficiency and user experience within the Ethereum ecosystem.
The Solutions
Initially, Buterin advocates for a substantial reduction in validators by establishing a minimum deposit requirement of 4,096 ETH and capping validators at this number. Doing so would markedly decrease the computational load on the network and streamline the consensus mechanism.
Alternatively, Buterin proposes the implementation of a two tier staking system. Validators would be categorized into the heavy layer, requiring a minimum deposit of 4,096 ETH and responsible for core consensus mechanisms. The light layer, comprising validators with no minimum deposit, would contribute to overall network security without the same level of direct involvement in consensus.
Finally, Buterin suggests a rotating participation model, randomly selecting a subset of 4,096 validators for each slot to engage in consensus. This would ensure a diverse and dynamic validator set while upholding efficiency and scalability. Buterin contends that this particular approach strikes the optimal balance between accountability and decentralization. The rotating participation method could therefore establish a more decentralized staking system without compromising security.
Still Some Complications
Dramatically reducing validators might lead to a concentration of power among a smaller group. Moreover, despite noble intentions, the practicality and successful execution of these proposals remain uncertain and could encounter significant obstacles.
Still, while acknowledging that his proposal deviates significantly compared to what the current design of Ethereum is, Buterin insists that the benefits are too substantial to overlook. He firmly believes this restructuring would fortify overall network security, decentralization, and accessibility to new users.
In any case, the outlined changes have the potential to revolutionize Ethereum. Given its status as the second largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization, these alterations may redefine the Ethereum network itself and possibly reshape the broader crypto industry landscape going forward.